The assessment of publication pressure in medical science; validity and reliability of a Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ).

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation

PubMedID: 24522963

Tijdink JK, Smulders YM, Vergouwen AC, De Vet HC, Knol DL. The assessment of publication pressure in medical science; validity and reliability of a Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ). Qual Life Res. 2014;.
PURPOSE
To determine content validity, structural validity, construct validity and reliability of an internet-based questionnaire designed for assessment of publication pressure experienced by medical scientists.

METHODS
The Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) was designed to assess psychological pressure to publish scientific papers. Content validity was evaluated by collecting independent comments from external experts (n = 7) on the construct, comprehensiveness and relevance of the PPQ. Structural validity was assessed by factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) using the generalized partial credit model. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to assess potential correlations with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalization subscales of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Single test reliability (lambda2) was obtained from the IRT analysis.

RESULTS
Content validity was satisfactory. Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the presence of three initially assumed separate domains of publication pressure (i.e., personally experienced publication pressure, publication pressure in general, pressure on position of scientist). After exclusion of the third domain (six items), we performed exploratory factor analysis and IRT. The goodness-of-fit statistics for the IRT assuming a single dimension were satisfactory when four items were removed, resulting in 14 items of the final PPQ. Correlations with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scales of the MBI were 0.34 and 0.31, respectively, supporting construct validity. Single test administration reliability lambda2 was 0.69 and 0.90 on the test scores and expected a posteriori scores, respectively.

CONCLUSION
The PPQ seems a valid and reliable instrument to measure publication pressure among medical scientists.